Milestones: 1998
The Higher Education Amendments of 1998 are enacted amending
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act to permit colleges and
universities to offer special age-based retirement incentives for
tenured faculty members at institutions of higher education; this
amendment replaces the former temporary exemptions which permitted
colleges and universities to mandatorily retire tenured faculty
members at age 65 and later at age 70.
The Supreme Court decides
Bragdon v. Abbott, a Title III (public accommodations)
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) case. The Court holds that an
individual with asymptomatic HIV is an individual with a disability
and therefore is protected by the ADA. Significantly, the Court
finds that reproduction is a major life activity under the
statute.
The Supreme Court, in
Faragher v. City of Boca Raton and
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, spells out the
circumstances in which employers will be held liable for acts of
sexual harassment carried out by their supervisory personnel. The
Court rules that employers are liable when the sexual harassment
has culminated in a tangible employment action directed against the
harassed employee (i.e., employee is terminated or demoted
after rejecting a supervisor's sexual advance). The Court further
rules that employers are permitted to establish an affirmative
defense to the claim, if it can show no tangible action was taken
against the harassed employee and two additional elements: (1) the
employer had communicated and established an effective procedure
for employees to seek redress from sexual harassment; and (2) the
harassed employee failed to take advantage of this procedure. If an
employer can show all of these elements, then it will not be held
responsible for the sexual harassment by its supervisory
personnel.
A unanimous Supreme Court rules in
Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services that sex
discrimination consisting of same-sex sexual harassment is
actionable under Title VII. The Court reiterates that the plaintiff
must prove that there was discrimination because of sex and that
the harassment was severe.
In
Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp., the Supreme
Court revisits the issue of whether a collective bargaining
agreement providing for the mandatory arbitration of discrimination
claims can bar individual charging parties from pursuing their EEO
claims in federal court. The Supreme Court decides that the
collective bargaining agreement at issue did not contain a clear
and unmistakable waiver and therefore the charging party could
pursue his employment discrimination claim in court.
EEOC resolves two sexual harassment suits involving large
classes of female victims. In EEOC v. Mitsubishi Motor
Manufacturing of America, the company agrees to pay $34
million in monetary relief to a class of 300 to 400 female
employees. EEOC's lawsuit had alleged that the company engaged in a
pattern of sexual harassment and retaliated against female
employees. In EEOC v. Astra USA, the agency alleged
that Astra engaged in a continuous pattern of sexual harassment of
its female employees. The company agreed to pay nearly $10 million
to 80 to 100 female victims.
The Department of Interior funds EEOC federal civil rights
enforcement in the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI).
The agency undertakes outreach efforts educating employers on their
EEO responsibilities as well as educating workers on their rights.
Individuals in the CNMI file 88 charges and EEOC issues reasonable
cause determinations in twenty five of these matters in the first
year of operation.
EEOC Vice Chairman Paul M. Igasaki becomes Acting Chairman
by operation of Title VII. He is the first Asian American to serve
in this capacity.

 |
| Chairwoman Ida L. Castro |
President Bill Clinton nominates and the Senate confirms Ida L. Castro to be Chairwoman of
EEOC. Castro is the first Hispanic American woman to chair the
agency. Prior to being named Chairwoman, Castro is the Acting
Director of the Women's Bureau at the Department of Labor.
Next: 1999
|