Chairman of the EEOC, 1969-1973
It is hard to believe that more than 30 years have elapsed since
passage of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, nearly 30
years since the inception of its effective date, and more than 21
years since I left the post of Chairman of the EEOC in December of
1973. During these periods of time we have seen significant changes
in the composition of the workforce, both in the public and private
sectors. In reminiscing about the years I served as Chairman of
EEOC, four things come to mind as major accomplishments of my
administration.
The most important action taken by the Commission from 1969 to
1973 was that action against AT&T. I place this first partly
because it changed how most of corporate America viewed the
Commission, and how it responded to charges filed against them, but
also because enforcement powers were not granted until well after
the action against AT&T.
The Commission voted to intercede in the telephone rate case
being presented by AT&T to the Federal Communications
Commission. Our position was that because of discriminatory
practices, costs for telephone services were higher than they would
have been otherwise. Lacking enforcement powers, the Commission
hoped to piggyback on the enforcement powers of FCC. The FCC denied
our motion to intervene in the rate case, but did agree to hold
separate hearings on our charges of discrimination. Our case
clearly showed discrimination by the various operating units of
AT&T against women and minorities. The case, which was settled
in early 1973 by consent decree, set the stage for other major
corporations to seriously consider changing their ways of hiring
and promoting women and minorities. I believe the settlement of the
AT&T case did more to change the corporation profile of this
country than any other litigation initiated before or since.
The second major accomplishment was securing enforcement powers
granted to the EEOC under the 1972 amendments. The lack of
enforcement power had hampered our efforts to eradicate
discrimination from its inception. Through the use of court
enforcement powers, the EEOC has instituted many lawsuits that have
pushed Title VII enforcement beyond what most individuals
envisioned. The ability to go directly into court with our won
attorneys clearly speeded up the change in attitude by major
corporations and secured appropriate relief for tens of thousands
of people.
The third area relates to the granting of enforcement powers:
establishment of five regional litigating centers in Chicago, San
Francisco, Atlanta, Philadelphia and Denver, each staffed with 30
lawyers. The litigating centers' purpose was to handle national,
regional and individual complaints in as cost-effective a manner as
possible. Under the 1972 amendments, the number of EEOC lawyers
jumped from 40 to more than 250. Enforcement powers were granted in
the Spring of 1972 and the centers were running by the end of that
year.
The fourth major accomplishment was the Resource Allocation
Program, instituted in late1972. Forty percent of Commission
resources were to be focused on handling major cases, looking at
major employers and their practices nationwide. Another 25 percent
of resources were to be focused on employers that had a major
impact on a regional level. The Commission would identify employers
with the greatest impact in a particular region, and then pursue
them to change their hiring and promotion practices region-wide.
Another 10 to 15 percent of resources were to be devoted to
resolving issues cases were selected not by who the employer was
but because an issue had to be decided or clarified by the courts.
Remaining resources were to be focused on individual charges. Other
accomplishments include the complete reorganization of the
Commission and the promotion of minorities and women into Senior
Executive-level positions.
I was indeed fortunate to have had the support of outstanding
employees who truly believe in the mission of the agency and who
devoted enormous time and energy toward eliminating discrimination
in all of its insidious forms. I am proud that I had the privilege
of serving as Chairman of this agency during a time when the EEOC
was recognized as a fiercely independent agency with a reputation
as an advocate for those who had been discriminated against. Of
equal importance, I am proud of our well-deserved reputation for
fairness.
The agency today is as critically important to the future of
this country as it has been at any point in its history.
See also: Chairman William
H. Brown, III's bio
|