TRANSCRIPT OF INTERVIEW WITH
MAURICE A. LAWRENCE
BY PAMELA CLAYTON*
Introduction
Mr. Lawrence was one of the original investigators for the
EEOC. He loves to travel, and he loves jazz music. He was a very
interesting person to talk to. I was amazed how he remembered
everything about the EEOC, as if he had just retired yesterday. I,
Pamela Clayton, had the pleasure to interview him by phone on
November 16, 17, and 19, 1999.
Interview
PC: Mr. Lawrence, where were you born?
ML: I was born in New York City, New York.
PC: Tell me about your family background or interesting family
history.
ML: My mother and father were from Jamaica. My maternal
grandfather was an attorney. My mother's brother was a judge. My
mother's other brother was a doctor, and my mother's sister was an
attorney. My mother was the oldest child in her family, and she was
the only non-professional. My father was an attorney. He attended
Howard University Law School in Washington, D. C.. He received a
master's in law from New York University. I am married to the
former Sylvia King of Washington, D. C.. She is a Howard University
graduate and a retired U.S. Government Economist. My sister is Mrs.
Eunice M. Hilton of New York.
PC: Can you tell me about your education?
ML: I graduated from Holy Trinity High School in Hackensack, New
Jersey. It was a private Catholic school. I graduated from Howard
University in Washington, D. C., class of 1953. My original class
was 1941, but I dropped out and went back. I received a Bachelor of
Arts degree in Political Science.
PC: What were your experiences or observations of
discrimination, especially employment discrimination, prior to
working for the EEOC?
ML: In 1937, when I was preparing to go to Howard University, I
had a summer job to save money to buy clothing and books. I was
working in New York as a handy man in a pocket book factory. When
the owner found out that I was going to college, he fired me on the
spot. He told me that his own son wasn't going to college. There
was also discrimination in the Post Office Department. Blacks who
were college educated scored high on the entrance examination, but
were only given temporary appointments. I made a 90.4 on the exam.
I was hired as a temporary substitute clerk. Whites were appointed
permanent positions. Promotions were based on seniority. Whites had
seniority over blacks.
PC: Did you have any personal involvement in the civil rights
movement prior to working for the EEOC?
ML: I participated in the March on Washington in Washington, D.
C. on August 28, 1963. This was where Martin Luther King made his
famous "I Have a Dream" speech. This speech was based on a speech
Dr. King made at Syracuse University. It was a framework for other
speeches. His speaking at Syracuse was on a high intellectual
level.
While working for the EEOC, I put myself on annual leave and
attended the James Meredith March in Mississippi as a private
citizen. Dr. King led this march. James Meredith was a citizen of
Mississippi who was denied admission to the University of
Mississippi. His case went to the Supreme Court.
PC: What was your work history prior to working for the
EEOC?
ML: I was active with the NAACP and the National Alliance of
Postal and Federal Employees. This was a black union in the postal
service. I hold a lifetime gold membership in this organization. It
still exists today. In February of 1999, 1 did a speech for them on
reflections of the past and present of civil rights.
PC: Did you have any other experiences that prepared you to work
for the EEOC?
ML: I was selected to work in the Contract Compliance program as
a Compliance Examiner. There were two executive orders that dealt
with fair employment, #10988 and #10925. Executive order # 10925
was a mandate from the federal government issued by President
Kennedy. Any business that had a contract with the Federal
government had to be a fair employer. They could not discriminate
against an African American because of his race. I was the first
person to be appointed in the U.S.A. Contract Compliance Examiner.
I became a hearing officer, in the Post Office Department, who
handled complaints and grievances of employees. This gave me
preparation for the EEOC.
PC: How were you recruited or hired to work for the EEOC and by
whom?
ML: Franklin D. Roosevelt Jr. was the first chairman of the
EEOC, and I served under him. I was an original member of the White
House Task Force under President Lyndon Johnson. The purpose of the
Task Force was to implement the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964. Mr. Pedro Esquivel, a colleague, introduced me to
commissioner Samuel Jackson, who recruited me for the
commission.
PC: What were the reasons you accepted employment with the
EEOC?
ML: I was always interested in that area. I was an employee with
the Grievance Committee of the Post Office. I was interested in a
promotion, and the EEOC was a promotional opportunity for me.
PC: Was working for the EEOC considered risky?
ML: Yes. Around 1965-1966, in Newbern, North Carolina (Craven
County), I was heading up a task force of investigators. The FBI
was notified for our protection. The agent in charge was reportedly
the brother-in-law of the leader of the Ku Klux Klan in North
Carolina. The Klan followed us, and we had to exchange cars two to
three times a day. We could not ride in our government-marked cars.
That was too risky. Also, in Augusta, Georgia, I was training a
former sheriff, William "Bill" Harris, who was white. We were
eating in a restaurant, and some white men were agitating us. I
ignored it. Mr. Harris tried to respond, but I held him back. I
told him that is what they wanted us to do. I said if we ignore
them, we can't be accused of anything. The white men said if Harris
came outside, they would mop up the street with him. In Memphis,
the atmosphere was very anti-EEOC and very tense. The Ku Klux Klan
was there.
PC: When did you begin working for the EEOC?
ML: July 2, 1965, as a member of the Select White House Task
Force. I was permanently appointed in December 1965.
PC: What was your first position held at the EEOC?
ML: An investigator. My title was Compliance Officer.
PC: Do you have any particular memories of training?
ML: Training in the Post Office Department was very intense. It
was a week-long program, Sunday through Saturday, 10-12 hours a
day. They taught you how to separate the "meat from the potatoes."
When you got the facts, you were supposed to look at them
objectively and make a determination based on the facts alone.
There was no formal training for the EEOC. The EEOC had to draw on
the experience of people from other agencies to provide the
training. I was one of the early investigators, and we did not have
much training.
PC: What type of training did you receive in conciliation?
ML: There was no specific training. We used trial and error. We
used good common sense. We would submit in writing a plan to the
respondents (goals and timetables included).
PC: Are there any people that you remember best from the
recruiting and training period and why?
ML: One of my early influences was Elmer Paul Brock, Deputy
Assistant, Postmaster General. Elmer died at the age of 37 from
cancer. When he was diagnosed with cancer, he wrote a letter to
President Kennedy and told him it was a privilege to work for him.
He said it was further gratifying to know that his five sons would
inherit the legacy of the leadership of President Kennedy. When I
saw him in his frail condition, working 12-14 hours a day at the
office attempting to eliminate discrimination, it served as an
inspiration to me to work many long hours to make a contribution to
the elimination of discrimination.
PC: Do you have any particular recollections of or experiences
with Presidents Johnson or Nixon, during this period?
ML: I met President Johnson at an Urban League reception in
1966. The remarks he made that evening reminded me of remarks made
by him to a group in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The President's face
lit up when I said that. He said "Do you remember that" and
smiled.
PC: Do you have any particular recollections of or experiences
with the first EEOC commissioners?
ML: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Jr. was the first chairman. Luther
Holcomb was the Vice Chairman. I also remember Sam Jackson and
Aileen Hernandez. I don't remember any outstanding contributions
that they made. I don't remember anything outstanding about
them.
PC: Do you have any particular recollections of or experiences
with members of Congress in the early days of the EEOC?
ML: I had a close relationship with Congressman Adam Clayton
Powell, Jr. He was chairman of the Education and Labor Committee.
They were responsible for bringing the civil rights legislation out
of committee to the floor of the House of Representatives for vote.
I also had a close relationship with Congressman John Conyers. When
Adam Powell had a censure hearing, Congressman John Conyers gave me
his personal pass to get on the floor of the House of
Representatives. He is still a member of the House today. He is the
ranking minority member of the House of Representatives Judiciary
Committee.
PC: Do you have any particular recollections of reactions of
members of the general public to the creation of the EEOC?
ML: The general public was suspicious. They did not have
confidence in a government agency to eliminate discrimination.
PC: What was your initial perception regarding the EEOC and its
mission/purpose?
ML: My perception was to put yourself (the EEOC) out of business
by eliminating discrimination. If we eliminated discrimination,
there would be no need for an agency like the EEOC.
PC: What type of cases did you work on in the early days?
ML: About 70%-80% of the cases were failure to hire cases
because of race.
PC: Were there any major developments in the EEOC policy during
the early years?
ML: The courts created a strong body of law. We utilized that
body of law to give us leverage.
PC: Was the practice of conciliation in the early days different
from what had been taught during the training period?
ML: There was no formal training in conciliation. Good
investigators moved into conciliation. They were doing both, being
investigators and doing conciliation.
PC: What were the strengths of conciliation?
ML: The conciliator's ability. Also, good faith and goodwill on
the part of the respondent, and the ability of conciliators to
recognize the fact that the respondent company was willing to
cooperate.
PC: What were the weaknesses of conciliation?
ML: The lack of enforcement power on the part of the EEOC. If
conciliation failed, all you could do was issue the charging party
a "right to sue" letter.
PC: What were some examples of successes with conciliation?
ML: AT&T and General Motors signed agreements over long
periods of time.
PC: What were some examples of failures with conciliation?
ML: I can't think of any right now.
PC: Do you think conciliation was an effective dispute
resolution procedure in the early days?
ML: I think it was very effective considering we didn't have
enforcement power. I think we made tremendous inroads. We used
gentle persuasion.
PC: How long did you serve as an EEOC investigator?
ML: For two years. From 1966-1968.
PC: How did your employment with the EEOC change over time?
ML: I went from investigator to Acting Regional Director of New
York in April 1968. I then became Deputy Regional Director of New
York. This was a permanent position. I held this position until I
retired in July 1975. My jurisdiction in the EEOC, that the New
York regional office controlled, was New York, New Jersey,
Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, U.S. Virgin Islands,
Massachusetts, Puerto Rico and New Hampshire.
PC: Do you have any particular recollections of or experiences
with subsequent EEOC commissioners?
ML: Eleanor Holmes Norton. She is now a delegate from the
District of Columbia to the U.S. House of Representatives. I met
her in April 1968. She was the chairperson of the New York City
Human Rights Commission before becoming chairperson of the EEOC. I
don't remember anything special about her.
PC: Do you have any particular recollections of or experiences
with members of Congress in the later days of the EEOC?
ML: Senator Edward W. Brooks. He was the former attorney general
of Massachusetts. He was also a senator from Massachusetts. He was
a classmate of mine from Howard University in Washington D. C. We
were personal friends. He let me use his office in Boston,
Massachusetts, because the EEOC did not have office facilities in
Massachusetts at that time. They were operating out of headquarters
in Washington. Today, he is a practicing attorney.
PC: In what ways did the EEOC change over time?
ML: The EEOC did not get economic support appropriations from
the administration and Congress so that it could provide resources
necessary to complete investigations. On the other hand, it got
strong support from the courts.
PC: Where there any changes in the use of conciliation over
time?
ML: It became sophisticated. The respondents became
sophisticated. Employers developed techniques to make the acts of
discrimination less apparent (had to dig and find it).
PC: What was the reason you left the EEOC?
ML: I was burnt out. I retired after 31 years of government
service, the last nine at the EEOC.
PC: What was the date you retired from the EEOC?
ML: It was July 1975.
PC: What was your subsequent employment/retirement history?
ML: I went to work as a consultant in the Joseph A. Davis
consultant firm in New York. The firm had people with various
experiences including the field of equal opportunity. I was a
consultant in the field of Equal Employment Opportunity. I was
assigned Project Director to lead a team at Goddard Space Agency in
Greenbelt, Maryland.
PC: Do you have any interesting life experiences since leaving
the EEOC?
ML: I have done lots of traveling to the Soviet Union, Hong
Kong, Thailand, Japan, and Europe. I also organized and founded a
jazz band called the Statesmen of Jazz in 1994. The members are
ages 65 and over. One member is 92 years old. We tour nationally.
Jazz was declared a national American treasure by the U.S.
Congress. The Bill, H. Con. Res. 57, was introduced on September
26, 1986. It was passed in December 1986. The King of Jazz was a
white man, Paul Whiteman. Benny Goodman was the King of Swing. In
spite of the fact that African Americans developed and prepared
Jazz as an art form, African Americans were designated as Duke,
Earl, Count, Baron, etc.
PC: Did you have any important life events, since leaving the
EEOC?
ML: When I retired, my wife and I lived in Freeport, Bahamas for
ten years. My neighbor was Count Basie. We shared jazz experiences.
Count Basie would take the month of December off to spend time with
his family. We used to do swapping stories where we would talk
about experiences that we had.
PC: Did you maintain any relationships with other EEOC
investigators or employees since leaving the EEOC?
ML: I remained friends with Monte Posey, who was my counterpart
in Wilmington, NC. I remained friends with Mr. Pedro Esquivel. I
also remained friends with Mr. Paul Brock. I am the Godfather to
one of his sons, Adam, who is named after Adam Clayton Powell, Jr.
There was also Everett 0. Ware. Mr. Ware was assigned to my task
force in 1967. I trained him. He was a good investigator. I also
keep in touch with Ms. Hortense Cridell, who was an administrative
secretary. She visited me and my wife last year.
PC: Do you have any current hopes for or expectations of the
EEOC?
ML: I am not close to the agency today to make an
observation.
PC: How did your years at the EEOC affect the rest of your
life?
ML: It was a rewarding experience to think that I was working in
a field where I could make a contribution to improve the lives of
people who were the victims of discrimination. On the other hand,
it was frustrating, because I couldn't eliminate discrimination
overnight.
PC: Is there anything else you would like to share with me?
ML: When I went to the EEOC, I waived my rights to tenure. I was
excepted or exempt from civil service protection. I was excepted
from my appeal rights.
* Pamela Clayton is a candidate for a Master of Arts Degree with
a specialization in Legal Studies at Southwest Texas State
University in San Marcos, Texas.
|