_________________, Complainant, v. Pete Geren, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency. Appeal No. 0120081802 Agency No. ARTACOM07OCT04708 DECISION Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's decision dated February 1, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. On June 25, 2007, complainant was hired as a temporary summer employee at the Sierra Army Depot in Herlong, California. Throughout her employment with the agency, complainant was a seventeen-year-old high school student. While her appointment was not to exceed September 30, 3007, complainant resigned from her position on August 14, 2007. On October 29, 2007, complainant first sought EEO counseling from the agency concerning her allegation that during her employment she was subjected to discrimination on the basis of sex (female) when she was sexually assaulted and harassed by a coworker. She filed a formal EEO complaint on the matter on January 17, 2008, which the agency dismissed, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO counselor contact. It is from this decision that complainant now appeals. The record indicates that complainant has alleged that while she initially performed clerical tasks, she later was asked to work away from the office in an outer building (Building 380) doing more manual labor. She states she was assigned to work with a regular agency employee (Coworker 1). She asserts that she and Coworker 1 often worked alone. She alleges that by August, Coworker 1 started "making lots of rude sexual comments to [her] and seemed to find ways to touch [her]." She said that over the next week or so, the comments and touching increased in frequency. Finally, she stated that during her last week of work "he became very aggressive and molested and raped me." She also alleges that he threatened her if she told anyone. She resigned from her position effective August 14, and initially told no one. However, on or about October 14, 2007, she thought she might be pregnant as a result of the alleged sexual assault, and told her parents what happened. Her parents then contacted the police, and the agency was informed of the charges. As the alleged events occurred on federal property, the matter was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as well as the local police. The record contains an affidavit from one of investigating FBI agents, who avers that during his interview with Coworker 1, he admitted to engaging in sexual touching of complainant over a period of time while they were working in Building 380 and to having sexual intercourse with her in August. Coworker 1 was later arrested and charged with unlawful sexual intercourse with a person under the age of 18, and resigned from the agency effective October 18, 2007. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action. The agency dismissed the complaint finding that the alleged last episode of sexual harassment occurred in August 2007, and complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO counselor until October 29, 2007, beyond the 45-day limitation period. On appeal, complainant's representative argues that the brief sexual harassment training complainant received from the agency during her new employee orientation was not presented to take into consideration the perspective of a teenager without any work experience. Moreover, complainant's representative asserts that as soon as complainant revealed what had happened to her parents, the matter was reported to the appropriate law enforcement officials and the agency, and was handled as a criminal matter and EEO was not considered. However, he asserts that sometime in October, an agency EEO official became aware of the matter and contacted complainant through her parents. As a result of this contact, complainant sought EEO counseling on October 29, 2007. The Commission finds that, under the circumstances of this case, equitable tolling of the limitation period is appropriate. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). Complainant was a minor child at the time of the incidents in question. While the agency argues that complainant received training related to EEO time frames, the Commission is not convinced that, as a minor, she understood the full magnitude of such timeframes or even the events that transpired. Moreover, there is no indication that complainant's parents, who were her legal guardians, had any knowledge of the time frames for EEO processing. Complainant did seek EEO counseling within 45 days of her parents' knowledge of the alleged sexual harassment. As such, the Commission finds that waiver of the timeframe is appropriate. Further, the Commission finds that not only did complainant raise a claim of hostile work environment/sexual harassment as recognized by the agency, but that she also raised a claim of constructive discharge as she asserts she was forced to leave the agency because of the alleged sexual harassment before the end of her employment period. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance with the Order set forth below. ORDER (E0408) The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request. A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408) Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0408) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408) This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408) If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action"). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations May 15, 2008 __________________ Date 2 0120081802 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P. O. Box 19848 Washington, D.C. 20036 5 0120081802