U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E.E.O.C.)
Office of Federal Operations
* * * ALLAN F., COMPLAINANT,
v.
DEBORAH LEE JAMES, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, AGENCY.
Request No. 0520160083
Appeal No. 0120132640
Hearing No. 510-2012-00386X
Agency No. 5R1S11009F13
March 11, 2016
 
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
 
The Agency timely requested reconsideration of the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120132640 (October 8, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c).
 
The record indicates that Complainant filed his complaint on October 13, 2011, alleging discrimination based on national origin (American with Arab ancestry) and age (over 40) when on July 1, 2011, he was informed his offer of employment in connection with vacancy announcement AFPC-306774-732459-KAA for the position of Physical Science Technician, IA-1311-02, equivalent to the GS-07/08/09/10 grade level, at the Agency’s Patrick Air Force Base in Cocoa Beach, Florida, was rescinded. At the conclusion of the investigation, Complainant requested a hearing before an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Administrative Judge (AJ). The AJ issued a decision without a hearing finding no discrimination concerning the complaint. The Agency fully implemented the AJ’s decision. Complainant appealed and the Commission reversed the Agency’s final decision and remanded the matter to the Agency for a hearing. Specifically, the Commission stated that the AJ’s decision without a hearing was improper in the instant case since there were too many unresolved issues which required an assessment as to the credibility of the various Agency officials and Complainant concerning the alleged incident.
 
In its request for reconsideration, the Agency merely reiterates its arguments previously made in response to Complainant’s previous appeal. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. §1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120132640 remains the Commission’s decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. The Agency shall comply with the Order as set forth herein.
  
ORDER
 
The Agency is directed to submit a copy of the complaint file to the EEOC Hearings Unit within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall provide written notification to the Compliance Officer at the address set forth below that the complaint file has been transmitted to the Hearings Unit. Thereafter, the Administrative Judge shall hold a hearing and issue a decision on the complaint in accordance with 29 C.F.R. §1614.109 and the Agency shall issue a final action in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110.
  
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)
 
Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.
  
COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)
 
This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
  
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
 
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
 
 
FOR THE COMMISSION:
 
Carlton M. Hadden
Director
Office of Federal Operations
This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website.