The mission of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC, Commission, or Agency) is to ensure equality of opportunity in employment by vigorously enforcing six Federal statutes. These statutes are: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, or national origin); the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended; title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, and sections 501 and 505 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (disability); and the Government Employee Rights Act of 1991, which extends protections against employment discrimination to certain employees who were not previously covered.
The significant action of a regulatory nature now under consideration is amending regulations governing age discrimination in employment to exempt from the prohibitions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) the practice of altering, reducing, or eliminating employer-sponsored retiree health benefits when retirees become eligible for Medicare or comparable State retiree health benefits. This rule will ensure that the application of the ADEA does not discourage employers from providing health benefits to their retirees. The Commission does not believe that the proposed exemption will have a significant impact on small business entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act because it imposes no economic or reporting burdens on such firms.
Consistent with section 4(c) of Executive Order 12866, this statement was reviewed and approved by the Chair of the Agency. The statement has not been reviewed or approved by the other members of the Commission.
EEOC
FINAL RULE STAGE
142. COORDINATION OF RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS WITH MEDICARE AND STATE HEALTH BENEFITS
Priority:
Other Significant
Legal Authority:
29 USC 628
CFR Citation:
29 CFR 1625
Legal Deadline:
None
Abstract:
The Commission proposes to exempt from the prohibitions of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. 621 et seq. (ADEA or Act), the practice of altering, reducing, or eliminating employer-sponsored retiree health benefits when retirees become eligible for Medicare or comparable State retiree health benefits.
Statement of Need:
In August 2001, the Commission announced that it would consider the relationship between the ADEA and employer-sponsored retiree health benefit plans that alter, reduce, or eliminate benefits upon eligibility for Medicare or a comparable State-sponsored retiree health benefits program. There has been a decline in the number of employers providing retiree health benefits over the last 10 years. Various factors have contributed to this erosion, including the increased cost of health care coverage, an increased demand for such coverage as large numbers of workers near retirement age, and changes in the way accounting rules treat the long-term costs of providing retiree health benefits. Another factor has been employer concern about the potential application of the ADEA to employer- sponsored retiree health benefits. The Commission is proposing a narrowly drawn ADEA exemption that permits the practice of coordinating employer-provided retiree health coverage with eligibility for Medicare or a State-sponsored retiree health benefits program, so that the ADEA does not discourage employers from providing, or continuing to provide, health benefits to their retirees.
Summary of Legal Basis:
Pursuant to section 9 of the ADEA, the Commission is authorized to establish reasonable exemptions to and from any or all provisions of the Act as it may find necessary and proper in the public interest.
Alternatives:
The Commission considered various alternatives in developing this proposal. The Commission will consider all alternatives offered by the public commenters.
Anticipated Cost and Benefits:
The Commission recognizes that while employers are under no legal obligation to offer retiree health benefits, some employers choose to do so in order to maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace, using these and other benefits to attract and retain the best talent available to work for their organizations. The proposed rule will ensure that the application of the ADEA does not discourage employers from providing, or continuing to provide, health benefits to their retirees who otherwise would have to obtain such coverage in the private individual marketplace at significant personal expense. The Commission believes that it is in the best interest of both employers and employees for the Commission to pursue a policy that permits employers to offer these benefits to the greatest extent possible. It is not anticipated that the proposal will result in increased costs.
Risks:
The proposed regulatory action will reduce the risks of liability for noncompliance with the statute by exempting certain employer practices from regulation. This proposal does not address risks to public safety or the environment.
Timetable:
| Action | Date | FR Cite |
|---|---|---|
| NPRM | 07/14/03 | 68 FR 41542 |
| NPRM Comment Period Ends | 09/12/03 | Final Action | 12/00/04 |
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:
No
Small Entities Affected:
No
Government Levels Affected:
Federal, Local, State
Agency Contact:
Dianna B. Johnston
Assistant Legal Counsel, Office of Legal Counsel
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
1801 L Street NW
Washington, DC 20507
Phone: 202 663-4638
TDD Phone: 202 663-7026
Fax: 202 663-4639
Email: dianna.johnston@eeoc.gov
RIN: 3046-AA72
This page was last modified on December 20, 2004.