U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Malcom N.,1 Complainant, v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency. Appeal No. 0120162612 Agency No. SSA-COI-16-0581 DECISION Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated July 11, 2016, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. BACKGROUND During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Contract Representative at the Agency's Birmingham Teleservice Center in Birmingham, Alabama. According to the Agency, Complainant initiated EEO Counselor contact on May 24, 2016. Informal efforts to resolve his concerns were unsuccessful. On June 12, 2016, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that he was subjected to harassment and a hostile work environment on the bases of race, national origin, sex, age, and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when: 1. on or about August 13, 2015, he found out that female co-workers alleged discrimination and management actively pursued in relieving them of their stress. However, when he had alleged harassment months earlier, on or about January 145, 2015, he remained in the same hostile work environment rather than being reassigned to a different duty station;2 2. on or about August 15, 2015, the EEO Specialist failed to assign him an EEO case number; and 3. in November 2014, his first line supervisor misrepresented the truth about the SSA policy when she told him that an instructor could not be his mentor. In its July 11, 2016 final decision, the Agency dismissed the formal complaint on the grounds of untimely EEO Counselor contact, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2). The Agency determined that Complainant's initial EEO Counselor contact was on May 24, 2016, which it found to be beyond the 45-day limitation period. The instant appeal followed. Complainant, on appeal, argued that the Agency erred dismissing his complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact. Specifically, Complainant argued that he initiated EEO contact on August 17, 2015, not on May 24, 2016. In support of his assertions, Complainant submitted a copy of an email dated September 14, 2015 that he sent to the EEO Counselor and a copy of the sign-in sheet indicating he visited the EEO office on August 17, 2015. The record contains a copy of Complainant's September 14, 2015 email to the EEO Counselor. Therein, Complainant stated "I was allowed by my manager, [manager] to go and file a sexual discrimination complaint more than three weeks ago...the SSA OCREO office has not responded to me since I complained and therefore I request Whistle Blower protection since it appears that the SSA Agency is refusing to acknowledge this sexual discrimination complaint." The record further reflects that the EEO Counselor responded to Complainant's email as follows: "Ok let me know when you are going upstairs." The record also contains a copy of a document titled "Daily Sign In Sheet" for Monday, August 17, 2015 in which Complainant entered his name and his purpose for visiting the EEO office. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action. Here, the Agency improperly dismissed Complainant's complaint on the grounds of untimely EEO Counselor contact. The alleged discriminatory events occurred on August 13 and 15, 2015, and November 2014, and Complainant initiated EEO Counselor contact on August 17, 2015, within the 45-day limitation period. In addition, The Commission has held that "[b]ecause the incidents that make up a hostile work environment claim collectively constitute one unlawful employment practice, the entire claim is actionable, as long, as at least one incident that is part of the claim occurred within the filing period. This includes incidents that occurred outside the filing period that the [Complainant] knew or should have known were actionable at the time of their occurrence." EEOC Compliance Manual, Section 2, Threshold Issues at 2 - 75 (revised July 21, 2005) (citing National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 117 (2002)). We note that two incidents comprising Complainant's hostile work environment claim (August 13 and 15, 2015) expressly identified above occurred within the 45-day time period preceding Complainant's August 17, 2015 EEO Counselor contact, as discussed above. Because a fair reading of the record reflects that the matter identified in the November 2014 claim is part of that harassment claim, we find that the Agency improperly dismissed the formal complaint on the grounds of untimely EEO Counselor contact. We REVERSE the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's formal complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact, defined herein as a harassment claim, and we REMAND this matter to the Agency for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below. ORDER (E1016) The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (harassment/hostile work environment) in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision was issued. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision was issued, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request. A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610) Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File a Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0416) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The requests may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610) This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations January 11, 2017 __________________ Date 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website. 2 The record reflects that the Agency inadvertently identified the date of alleged discriminatory event as August 15, 2015 instead of August 13, 2015. --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------- ------------------------------------------------------------ 2 0120162612 5 0120162612