Skip top navigation Skip to content

Print   Email  Share


Kmart To Pay $120,000 To Settle EEOC Age Bias Suit

Pharmacist Called ‘Greedy’ for Working at Age 70, Then Forced to Quit and Threatened With Legal Action in Retaliation for Complaining, Federal Agency Charged

HONOLULU – Kmart Corporation will pay $120,000 and furnish other relief to settle an age harassment, constructive discharge and retaliation lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today. The  EEOC had charged that Kmart discriminated against a 70-year-old pharmacist at a  Honolulu  store.

According to the EEOC’s suit, over the course  of four years, a pharmacy manager openly professed on several occasions that  the pharmacist was “too old,” “should just retire,” and was “greedy” for  continuing to work at age 70. Further,  the EEOC said, the manager continued to humiliate her in writing by stating, “The  pharmacy is no longer your forte” and “You need to retire from pharmacy work  now,” in a communication book open to the entire department.

The manager also purposely  scheduled her to work on Sundays – knowing that she attended church those days – to encourage her to quit, according to the EEOC. The agency further contended that the victim  complained to a district manager, general manager and human resources manager  regarding the age-based harassment, to no avail.

Further, the EEOC charged, Kmart threatened legal action against the pharmacist using a pretext on an unrelated  matter to retaliate against her for her discrimination complaint. Finally, the EEOC said, she had to quit to  escape the mistreatment.

In June 2009, the EEOC filed its  lawsuit in U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii (EEOC v. Kmart Corporation, et al., Case No. CV09-00300 SOM BMK), claiming that Kmart failed to take remedial action, which forced the pharmacist  to resign. The EEOC argued that the  harassment and Kmart’s failure to adequately address it were in direct violation  of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA).

“Instead of addressing this pharmacist’s legitimate complaints of age discrimination, Kmart made a bad  situation worse by threatening her for complaining,” said EEOC Acting Chairman  Stuart J. Ishimaru. “Such retaliation  only compounds an employer’s culpability.”

In cooperation with the EEOC, Kmart  entered into a three-year consent decree which also stipulated that Kmart post  a notice on the matter; hire an EEO trainer; review and revise its existing  anti-discrimination policy; provide annual ADEA training to all staff; and  ensure that performance evaluations reflect discriminatory misconduct by management staff.

“Older workers should be valued for  their experience, not viewed as a liability,” said Anna Y. Park, regional  attorney for the EEOC’s Los Angeles District Office, which includes Hawaii in its  jurisdiction. “Under no circumstances  will the EEOC tolerate employers pushing out their older workers simply because  of age. The EEOC forcefully protects people  against this kind of age-based discrimination.”

Timothy Riera, director of the EEOC’s Honolulu Local  Office, added, “Employers should handle complaints of  discrimination, including harassment, in an expeditious manner. Training on a company's EEO policies should  occur periodically, and if someone if found to be in violation, appropriate disciplinary action should immediately be taken.”

According to company information, Kmart, a wholly owned  subsidiary of Hoffman Estates, Ill.-based Sears Holdings Corporation, operates  1,368 general merchandise stores across the U.S. and its territories.

The EEOC is the federal agency that enforces federal laws prohibiting  employment discrimination. Further  information about the EEOC is available on the agency’s web site at