Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Data Tools and Products
  3. Data Visualization: All Harassment

Data Visualization: All Harassment

The following visuals reflect charges of employment discrimination and resolutions for all harassment charges, spanning from FY 2016 – FY 2020.

Total Charge Receipts Versus All Harassment Receipts
FY 2016 - FY 2020

  FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
Total Receipts 91,503 84,254 76,418 72,675 67,448
Harassment Receipts 28,216 26,978 26,699 26,221 24,221
Percent of Harassment Receipts 30.8% 32.0% 34.9% 36.1% 35.9%
Image
All Harassment Receipts  2020 - 1

FY 2016 – FY 2020:

  • As a percentage of total charges, receipts that included a claim for harassment increased.
  • Total receipts decreased by 26.3%.
  • Receipts that included a claim for harassment decreased by 14.2%.

*All harassment charges include sexual harassment allegations filed under all statutes.

**Charge data includes all charges filed by individuals in the private sector and state and local government workplaces; it does not include discrimination complaints in the federal sector.

***For all definitions of terms please go to: https://www.eeoc.gov/enforcement/definitions-terms.

 

Total Monetary Benefits Versus All Harassment Monetary Benefits
FY 2016 - FY 2020

  FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
Total Monetary Benefits $348.00 $355.60 $353.90 $346.60 $333.2
Harassment Monetary Benefits (Millions) $125.5 $125.5 $134.0 $139.6 $137.3
Percent of Harassment Monetary Benefits 36.1% 35.3% 37.9% 40.3% 41.2%
Image
Total Monetary Benefits Versus All Harassment Monetary Benefits 2020 - 2

FY 2016 – FY 2020:

  • As a percentage of total monetary benefits, monetary benefits for charges that included a claim for harassment increased.
  • Total monetary benefits decreased by $14.8 million, a change of 4.3%.
  • Monetary benefits that included a claim for harassment increased by $11.8 million, a change of 9.4%.

*All harassment charges include sexual harassment allegations filed under all statutes.

**Charge data includes all charges filed by individuals in the private sector and state and local government workplaces; it does not include discrimination complaints in the federal sector.

***For all definitions of terms please go to: https://www.eeoc.gov/enforcement/definitions-terms.

 

Total Resolutions Versus All Harassment Resolutions
FY 2016 - FY 2020

  FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
Total Resolutions 97,443 99,109 90,558 80,806 70,804
All Harassment Resolutions 30,582 31,411 30,585 28,164 25,673
Percent of All Harassment Resolutions 31.4% 31.7% 33.8% 34.9% 36.3%
Image
Total Resolutions Versus All Harassment Resolutions 2020 -3

FY 2016 – FY 2020:

  • As a percentage of total resolutions, resolutions of charges that included a claim for harassment increased.
  • Total resolutions decreased by 27.3%.
  • Resolutions of charges that included a claim for harassment decreased by 16.1%.

*All harassment charges include sexual harassment allegations filed under all statutes.

**Charge data includes all charges filed by individuals in the private sector and state and local government workplaces; it does not include discrimination complaints in the federal sector.

***Resolutions - All charges closed in the administrative process, comprised of charges with no cause findings, administrative closures, and merit resolutions

****For all definitions of terms please go to: https://www.eeoc.gov/enforcement/definitions-terms.

 

Resolutions - Age-Based
FY 2016 - FY 2020

Image
Resolutions – All Harassment 2020 -4
  FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
No Reasonable Cause 64.8% 68.0% 67.7% 67.1% 63.8%
Administrative Closures 17.7% 16.0% 15.7% 16.2% 17.4%
Merit Resolutions 17.4% 16.0% 16.6% 16.6% 18.8%
  • Resolutions - All charges closed in the administrative process, comprised of charges with no cause findings, administrative closures, and merit resolutions.
  • No Reasonable Cause - EEOC’s determination not to proceed further with its investigation. This determination does not certify that the respondent is in compliance with the statutes EEOC enforces. In issuing this determination, the EEOC makes no decision about the merits of claims alleged in the charge or of any other issues that could be construed as having been raised by the charge. The charging party may exercise the right to bring a private court action.
  • Administrative Closures - Charge closed for administrative reasons without a determination based on the merits, which include: lack of jurisdiction due to untimeliness, insufficient number of employees, or lack of employment relationship; charging party requests withdrawal without receiving benefits; or charging party requests the notice of right to sue.
  • Merit Resolutions - Charge resolved with an outcome favorable to charging party or charge with meritorious allegations. These are comprised of negotiated settlements, withdrawals with benefits, successful conciliations, and unsuccessful conciliations.

*All harassment charges include sexual harassment allegations filed under all statutes.

**Charge data includes all charges filed by individuals in the private sector and state and local government workplaces; it does not include discrimination complaints in the federal sector.

***For all definitions of terms please go to: https://www.eeoc.gov/enforcement/definitions-terms.

 

Merit Resolutions - All Harassment
FY 2016 - FY 2020

Image
Merit Resolutions - All Harassment 2020 -5
  FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020
Settlements 45.2% 43.8% 38.3% 42.3% 45.0%
Withdrawals w/Benefits 35.6% 36.9% 38.0% 40.0% 39.5%
Unsuccessful Conciliations 11.4% 12.4% 13.8% 11.1% 9.2%
Successful Conciliations 7.8% 6.9% 9.8% 6.7% 6.3%
  • Settlements - Charge settled during investigation with benefits to charging party.
  • Withdrawals w/Benefits - Charge is withdrawn, at the request of charging party, who will receive benefits through a separate agreement with the employer.
  • Successful Conciliations - Charge with reasonable cause determination closed after resolution of the charge through voluntary efforts, whereby EEOC is a party to the agreement.
  • Unsuccessful Conciliations - Charge with reasonable cause determination closed after failure to resolve the charge through voluntary efforts. Because "reasonable cause" has been found, this resolution is considered a merit resolution.

*All harassment charges include sexual harassment allegations filed under all statutes.

**Charge data includes all charges filed by individuals in the private sector and state and local government workplaces; it does not include discrimination complaints in the federal sector.

***For all definitions of terms please go to: https://www.eeoc.gov/enforcement/definitions-terms.