Breadcrumb

  1. Inicio
  2. node
  3. ROBERTSON SANITATION TO PAY $475,000 IN EEOC LAWSUIT CHARGING IT FAILED TO HIRE FEMALE DRIVERS
Press Release

ROBERTSON SANITATION TO PAY $475,000 IN EEOC LAWSUIT CHARGING IT FAILED TO HIRE FEMALE DRIVERS

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

PRESS RELEASE
2-17-09

Trash Removal Company Hired Less Qualified Males, EEOC Charged

ATLANTA – Robertson Sanitation, a Phoenix-based trash hauling, recycling and disposal company that operates in Georgia, will pay $475,000 to settle a sex discrimination lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced today.

According to the EEOC’s suit, Jeanine Moore applied for a truck driver position with Robertson at its Winder, Ga., facility in August 2005. Although she was more qualified than a number of male applicants who were hired, Moore was never interviewed and never received an offer. The EEOC said that the job applications for the Winder location between January 2005 and September 2006 shows that some of the men hired were less qualified than Moore, including six males who the agency claims lacked Robertson’s minimum qualifications for the truck driver position. Investigation of Moore’s allegations revealed a class of similarly qualified women who, like Moore, were also rejected despite their qualifications. The EEOC said the employer subjected female applicants to discriminatory hiring practices at the Winder facility as well as the Austell, Ga., facility.

The consent decree settling the suit provides for $475,000 in monetary relief to the class of qualified female applicants who were discriminatorily rejected for employment between January 1, 2005 and October 31, 2006. Moore will receive $70,000 in damages while the remaining funds will be distributed among the remaining qualified claimants whose eligibility will be determined by a procedure set forth in the decree.

In addition to the monetary relief, Robertson Sanitation, a division of Republic Services of Georgia, has agreed to exercise good faith in offering employment to qualified female applicants for residential, commercial, industrial and roll-off truck driver positions at the Winder and Austell facilities. According to the decree, “good faith will be measured against the standard of offering employment to at least 70% of the females in the qualified applicant pool.”

The decree has a term of four years and requires Robertson to submit a report each year identifying the name, sex and qualifications of all qualified applicants for truck driver positions, the persons offered positions, and the persons hired. Robertson shall also maintain all driver applications for the duration of the decree for inspection, and provide an explanation for each time a qualified female applicant is not offered a position. The EEOC will have the right to review Robertson's compliance with the requirements of the decree through, among other things, inspection of all documents used or considered in the hiring process.

The decree also provides that Robertson shall not discriminate against qualified applicants on the basis of gender, nor retaliate against any person who opposed discriminatory practices or participates in proceedings under Title VII. The decree also includes provisions for equal employment opportunity training, reporting, and posting of notices. In the suit and consent decree, Robertson Sanitation denied any liability or wrongdoing.

“We are pleased with the employer’s efforts to quickly resolve this dispute, while taking affirmative steps to remain in compliance with the law in the future,” said Robert Dawkins, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Atlanta District Office. “The decree takes into consideration the fact that Robertson hired seven female drivers after the discrimination charge was filed. The hiring goals are designed to ensure that the employer continues hiring qualified women in the future.”

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination based on race, color, gender (including sexual harassment and pregnancy), religion, national origin, age, disability and retaliation. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov.


This page was last modified on February 17, 2009.

Return to Home Page